@letterbox
...you are saying, that discussions about the future of our loved software has driven people away from it so much that AD decided to shut it down?? Really??
First of all, not every thread turned out into that "negative" direction. We had some kind of focus to the "What if..." thread and it is GOOD to have something like that.
Shouting out "The future is bright" does not help anything, because with the acquisition of Soft by AD it was so clear, it won´t be, it can´t be, because it was AD who bought Soft.
To me, it´s the vendor, the owner of a package that is the one who should trie to get users for its software to make money! For seom reason, AD DID NOT! It was not to the userbase to gain attention or a certain forum like ours. AD did not show any interest in marketing Softimage, that´s what we always pointed out and complained about.
Maybe the overall plan got a little clearer now:
- buy Soft
- rip off all the patents, try to put inventions and forces to Maya
- develop Soft on low speed and level = low costs
- fulfill the contract ("leave Softimage alive for min 5 years after acquisition..")
- stop development
- try to draw Softimage people to Maya by giving them a license after killing Soft
...and they might do the same with Max soon...would make sense..
Soft is the best out of the box out there, and NOTHING comes even close by now. And honestly, I don´t see anything at the horizon. I will stick with is as long as possible but also look into other direction...if possible, no AD product ever again ;)
Once again, we have great community and fearing the dead of our software may drove some potential users off. But most who ever tried Soft, began to like it or love it. So, I don´t think that we had such a large impact on seeing Softimage vanishing in the coming years. Its AD fault, an no one other is responsible for that. Don´t blame US for their faults ;)
cheers,
oli